Nevada Highway Patrol: Inside the Most Controversial Cases

1 / 20

2 / 20

3 / 20

4 / 20

5 / 20

6 / 20

7 / 20

8 / 20

9 / 20

10 / 20

11 / 20

12 / 20

13 / 20

14 / 20

15 / 20

16 / 20

17 / 20

18 / 20

19 / 20

20 / 20

❮ ❯

Nevada Highway Patrol officers seized Stephen Lara ’ s life savings, despite not charging him with any crime. Now the state high court has ruled that the state broke the. State law was supposed to prohibit the Nevada Highway Patrol (NHP) from confiscating every penny of Stephen Lara’s life savings when they pulled him over for a routine. In the first decision of its kind in Nevada , a judge ruled last week that state law enforcement can’t evade stricter requirements for seizing cash and property by. The ruling states that Nevada law enforcement can’t use a federal program to bypass existing state laws enacted to protect property owners. This stems from a 2021 case. A groundbreaking Nevada court ruling prevents state police from circumventing strict state laws by using federal civil forfeiture programs to seize assets. A Nevada court ruling prohibits local law enforcement from using federal programs to circumvent state forfeiture laws. The case concerns the Nevada Highway Patrol ’s. A Nevada judge ruled that state police can’t use a federal loophole to seize people’s property, as highway patrol did when officers seized a Marine Corps veteran’s life. The case that prompted this ruling arose from a 2021 incident involving Stephen Lara, a Marine veteran whose life savings were seized by the Nevada Highway Patrol during. A Washoe County judge has ruled against Nevada Highway Patrol in a civil forfeiture case , saying the agency cannot use a federal program to bypass state laws in regard to. IJ client Stephen Lara sued to hold Nevada accountable after the state’s highway patrol seized his life savings. The government got a court to put his case on hold.